Internet poker operations in California

“First, we want to acknowledge your work to make progress on this controversial issue. We also commend the Appropriations Committee for advancing the concept of delays in eligibility for past illegal actors and financial penalties for past illegal acts.

“That said, as this coalition clearly and consistently expresses, resolving the question of conformity in a manner that truly and effectively maintains the highest integrity in internet poker operations in California remains an extremely important and important issue to address visit dewapoker. Language must have real consequences for the past illegal operations of the iPoker website from 2006 to 2011, and must not allow the company to benefit from tainted assets (including financial assets, brand recognition and player data) obtained from that illegal behavior.

“Unfortunately, the June 27 version of the bill does not solve the fundamental problem of our suitability. However, we do offer an attached amendment that will:

“• Determines that any service provider applicant engaged in internet gambling after December 31, 2006 without a license is not suitable for licensing for 10 years from the date of the first legal Internet poker betting in California.

“• Causes any assets, such as trademarks, trade names, databases or other intellectual property used for Internet gambling without a license after December 31, 2006, do not qualify for use for 10 years from the date of the first legal Internet poker betting in California.

“• Require, after the expiration of the 10 year incompatibility period, that persons and entities are not eligible for a license to pay $ 60 million against the Internet Gaming Enforcement Fund before being deemed fit.

“• Change the existing non-severability provisions to prevent the lawsuit from canceling the compliance and critical feasibility requirements of this bill.